Register For UPSC IAS New Batch

CAG AUDIT FLAGS MAJOR GAPS IN GREEN INDIA MISSION

For Latest Updates, Current Affairs & Knowledgeable Content.

CAG AUDIT FLAGS MAJOR GAPS IN GREEN INDIA MISSION

Why in News?

  • The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has flagged major shortcomings in the implementation of the Green India Mission (GIM).
  • The key concerns include:
    • Inadequate funding
    • Weak coordination between government schemes
    • Poor monitoring
    • Weak planning
    • Failure to achieve important targets related to forest cover and forest quality.
  • The CAG audit examined the planning, implementation and monitoring of GIM interventions in 16 States and Union Territories during 2015-16 to 2024-25.

KEY FINDINGS OF THE CAG AUDIT

  • The GIM had targeted improvement in the quality of forest cover over 1.4 million hectares.
  • However, improvement was observed in only 0.11384 million hectares.
  • This represents a 91.87% shortfall from the target.
  • Similarly, the target was to increase forest cover over 1.4 million hectares.
  • Actual increase was recorded over only 0.03409 million hectares.
    • This represents a 97.57% shortfall.

MAJOR REASONS FOR THE SHORTFALL

The CAG attributed the poor performance to:

  • Inadequate convergence with other government programmes.
  • Insufficient funding.
  • Deficiencies in planning.
  • Weak monitoring mechanisms.

ABOUT GREEN INDIA MISSION

  • The Green India Mission (GIM) was launched by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) in 2014.
  • Its broad aim is to protect, restore and enhance India’s forest cover.
  • It is one of the eight missions under the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC).

MAJOR OBJECTIVES

The mission seeks to:

  • Improve forest and tree cover.
  • Improve the quality of existing forest and tree cover.
  • Enhance biodiversity.
  • Improve ecosystem services.
  • Strengthen water conservation.
  • Increase carbon sequestration.
  • Improve forest-based livelihoods.

Targets

The GIM envisages:

  • Increasing forest and tree cover over 5 million hectares.
  • Improving the quality of forest and tree cover over another 5 million hectares.

IMPORTANCE OF GIM FOR INDIA’S CLIMATE COMMITMENTS

  • Forest and tree cover are an important part of India’s climate strategy.
  • Enhancing forest and tree cover contributes to carbon sequestration.
  • Under its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, India has committed to creating an additional carbon sink of 2.5–3 billion tonnes of COequivalent by 2030 through additional forest and tree cover.
  • India’s Long-Term Low-Carbon Development Strategy identifies the Green India Mission as one of the important programmes supporting this objective.

CONVERGENCE ISSUES

  • The GIM was expected to work together with several other government programmes.
  • However, the CAG found that this planned convergence was not effectively achieved.

MAJOR SCHEMES INVOLVED

  • Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA)
  • Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS)
  • Nagar Van Yojana
  • School Nursery Yojana
  • According to the audit, several of these programmes continued to operate largely in silos.
  • This reduced the potential benefits of combining financial resources, manpower and implementation mechanisms.

FUNDING GAPS

  • The CAG found that the mission failed to secure around ₹10,600 crore in proposed funding support.
  • For the initial four years:
    • ₹2,000 crore had been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs.
    • Another ₹400 crore was expected from 13th Finance Commission grants towards the States’ share.
  • However, during the 10 years examined, only ₹1,149.14 crore was received through budgetary support.
  • This was only 88% of the expected budgetary support.

WEAK FINANCIAL CONTROLS

  • The audit also identified shortcomings in financial management.
  • Eight States and Union Territories did not maintain annual accounts.
  • In other cases:
    • Accounts were unaudited.
    • Records contained discrepancies with subsidiary records.
  • Such weaknesses reduce transparency and make it difficult to properly track the use of public funds.

WHY IS THE GREEN INDIA MISSION IMPORTANT?

1. Climate Change Mitigation

  • Forests act as important carbon sinks.
  • Increasing forest and tree cover can help India meet its climate commitments.

2. Biodiversity Conservation

  • Healthy forests provide habitat for numerous species.
  • Restoration of degraded forests can improve ecosystem health and biodiversity.

3. Water Security

  • Forest ecosystems support water retention, groundwater recharge and watershed protection.
  • Forest degradation can increase soil erosion and affect water availability.

4. Livelihood Support

  • Forest-dependent communities rely on forests for livelihoods and non-timber forest produce.
  • Improved forest ecosystems can strengthen these livelihood opportunities.

5. Ecosystem Services

  • Forests provide services such as:
    • Carbon sequestration
    • Soil conservation
    • Water regulation
    • Biodiversity protection
    • Climate regulation

POLITICAL RESPONSE

  • The Congress party criticised the government following the CAG findings.
  • Congress Rajya Sabha MP and former Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh described the Green India Mission as a “gigantic fraud”.
  • He argued that the mission, originally conceived in 2010 as part of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s National Action Plan on Climate Change, had placed strong emphasis on:
    • Monitoring
    • Planning
    • Effective implementation
  • He criticised the present implementation as falling short of the original objective of achieving genuine sustainable environmental change.

KEY CONCERNS HIGHLIGHTED

  • Very large gap between targets and actual outcomes.
  • Insufficient financial support.
  • Poor convergence among government programmes.
  • Schemes operating in isolated silos.
  • Weak planning and monitoring.
  • Poor financial record-keeping in several States and UTs.
  • Inadequate accountability for achieving mission targets.

WAY FORWARD

  • Ensure adequate and predictable funding for GIM.
  • Improve convergence between GIM, CAMPA, MGNREGS, Nagar Van Yojana and other relevant programmes.
  • Strengthen state-level planning and implementation capacity.
  • Establish stronger monitoring and evaluation mechanisms with measurable outcomes.
  • Ensure regular auditing and transparent financial reporting.
  • Use scientific data and remote sensing to monitor changes in forest cover and quality.
  • Focus not only on increasing forest area but also on improving forest quality, biodiversity and ecosystem services.
  • Ensure greater participation of local and forest-dependent communities in restoration activities.
  • Align GIM implementation more effectively with India’s NDC and long-term climate goals.

 

Note: Connect with Vajirao & Reddy Institute to keep yourself updated with latest UPSC Current Affairs in English.

Note: We upload Current Affairs Except Sunday.

Call Now Button