Govt rethinking ‘safe harbour’ in Digital India Bill : How this could change internet landscape?
Context- “Should online intermediaries be entitled to safe harbour at all,” asked Minister of State for Electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Thursday as he presented a broad overview of the upcoming Digital India Bill – the proposed successor to the decades-old Information Technology Act, 2000.
(Credits- Terms Feed)
The proposed law will impact a host of entities on the Internet, including social media, e-commerce, and artificial intelligence-based platforms.
What is the new law for the Internet?
- Currently, the Information Technology Act, 2000 is the core framework that regulates entities on the Internet. However, the law needs an update since it was framed for an Internet era that looked very different from the Internet of today.
- Given its limitations, the government has also on occasion found it difficult to promulgate rules since the parent Act is limited in its scope.
- Chandrasekhar said that the core objectives of the new Digital India Bill are to ensure an open and safe Internet in the country to ensure users’ rights and reduce risks for them online; accelerate the growth of technology innovation.
- The Bill is a key pillar of an overarching framework of technology regulations the Centre is building, including the draft Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022; Indian Telecommunication Bill, 2022; and a policy for non-personal data governance.
What is ‘safe harbour’?
- Safe harbour – as prescribed under Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 – is legal immunity that online intermediaries enjoy against content posted by users on their platforms. This is available as long as these platforms abide by certain due diligence requirements, such as censoring content when asked by the government or courts.
- The concept originally came from Section 230 of the United States’ Communications Decency Act, which has been termed “one of the foundational laws behind the modern Internet”.
- It is one of the main reasons behind the meteoric rise of Internet giants such as Facebook that have defined the Web 2.0 era where users can post content on the internet.
Why revisit the norm?
- Chandrasekhar said that today’s Internet poses new challenges.
- “In the 2000s, intermediaries equalled safe harbour, but today they have morphed into multiple types of participants on the Internet that are functionally very different from each other and require different types of guardrails and regulatory requirements. Indeed, a question – how many of them should be entitled to safe harbour,” Chandrasekhar said.
- “What should we consider as a safe harbour for intermediaries? Who should be entitled for safe harbour and should the government at all be playing the arbiter between platforms and those who are aggrieved by content on them,” the minister said. “There is a greater diversity and complexity about the platforms that are on the Internet today and therefore, there is this legitimate question – should there be a safe harbour at all? If there is a need for safe harbour, who should get it?”
What else will the Digital India Bill deal with?
- The proposed law will also regulate a range of crimes that the government thinks are unique to the online space. Chandrasekhar said that “the weaponisation of misinformation” under the garb of free speech will not be entertained and will be regulated under the Bill.
- Other harms include cyberbullying, doxxing, and identity theft.
Source- Indian Express
NEWS- Govt rethinking ‘safe harbour’ in Digital India Bill : How this could change internet landscape?
Syllabus- Prelims; Current Affairs